Weak Topic Reviews
When a child gets a bad grade, Learning Hub doesn't just record it — it remembers the topic and helps reinforce it through bonus tasks.
How it works
- The child receives a grade of 2, 3, 4, or 5 on a specific topic
- The system creates a "topic for review" — a record that this topic needs reinforcement
- When the child takes a bonus task — the bot prioritizes weak topics
- After enough repetitions, the topic is considered reinforced
How many repetitions are needed
The number of repetitions depends on the grade — the worse the grade, the more repetitions:
| Grade | Repetitions to close |
|---|---|
| 2 (good) | 1 |
| 3 (satisfactory) | 2 |
| 4 (poor) | 3 |
| 5 (fail) | 3 |
Each successfully completed bonus task on the topic counts as one repetition.
Topic priority
When the child asks for a bonus task, the bot doesn't choose a topic randomly. Priority:
- Worst grade — topics with 5s and 4s come first
- Fewer repetitions — topics that haven't been reviewed yet are more important
- More recent — recent topics are more relevant
To prevent the child from getting stuck on one topic, the bot randomly selects from the 4 highest-priority topics.
When all topics are closed
If all weak topics have been worked through and the child wants another task — the bot doesn't refuse. Instead, it randomly selects a topic from recent grades (last 30 days). If favorite subjects are configured — the bot will prefer a topic from those. The task will be non-standard and exploratory — to dive deeper into the subject. This is voluntary practice, and the bot always praises the initiative.
Non-academic subjects
After grade sync, the system may create review topics for PE, music, art, or shop class. The bot automatically closes such topics — bonus tasks for them don't make sense.
What's next
- Bonus Tasks — how the child completes reviews
- Grades — how grades enter the system
- Configuration — how to change repetition thresholds